Wednesday, January 05, 2011

Could Sarah Palin be right about Michelle Obama?! - CSMonitor.com

Could Sarah Palin be right about Michelle Obama?! - CSMonitor.com:
"In an editorial the Wall Street Journal criticizes Sarah Palin for criticizing Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity campaign. The point seems to be that such talk from the Ms. Bully Pulpit is innocuous or benign. The writer makes an analogy with Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” anti-drug campaign.

Now if Michelle Obama were just a Chicago-based community activist who was organizing a nation-wide propaganda campaign to urge people to eat healthily I would have no objection."


Interesting thoughts. Does Ms. Obama speak for herself or her government when she speaks? If she is good enough to meet heads of states without her husband, can she not represent her government in other things. If the president can be held responsible for what he says as being government beliefs, then her words would be as well.
Yes she has the right to free speech, we all do. But free speech gets lost when you are an official government person. It can not go both way.
When the government steps in and tries to educate us, we must remember that other than public schools, that is not their job.
Yes I think obesity is a problem in America. A simple trip to a Wal-mart on any weekend will show you that. But when the government steps in and tries to use its bully pulpit, then maybe we should talk back.

Spam Campaign May Mark Comeback for Storm, Waledac Operators - Security - News & Reviews - eWeek.com


Interesting new worm out there. While the mass emails that told you go to some link had for the most part died down, they seem to be back again. This one has you download a fake Acrobat reader update to infect you. What gets to me is the staggering numbers it seems to be generating.

"'The overall volume is hard to estimate as it depends on many factors,' Tillmann Werner, malware analyst at Kaspersky Lab, told eWEEK. 'We observed one successfully delivered mail per second on average—that means 3,600 spam mails per hour or 86,400 per day for each bot. The botnet is still very young and constantly growing. We counted about 2,500 different IP addresses that participate in the fast-flux service network which is used to hide the C&C [command and control] infrastructure. The total number of infected machines is probably magnitudes higher, but there is currently no way to measure it."
What really gets to me is that these people could be real successful in a real job and yet they do this.